Sorry if these questions are a bit basic and/or stupid.įinally, what do you mean by Bogners never being interesting enough to fully analyze? Do you mean they never sounded good enough to you, or do you mean that they aren't technologically advanced enough to be interesting, or something else? If that is true, what do you mean by 'corner values'?ĭo I have enough info for him to build a clone? Looking at the extra information you have provided, I'm now wondering if it is in fact the complete schematic? My electronics skills are very basic.I work on wiring pickups etc, that's all! Looking at the pdf you provided I thought it was just referring to the overdrive channel. So, I decided that I would try to find the schematic for the Bogner Ecstacy and see what quote he would give to build a clone. He will do a Marshall style amp for around $400 US Dollars. Apparently he did a good job and now he is building 'clones' for people. He said that when he lived in Poland there was a guy he used to take his amps (and his pupil's amps) to for repair that was really good. I mentioned that I'd tried this Bogner Ecstacy amp but that it was ridiculously expensive. I play in a 12-piece reggae band and we have recently been joined by a great guitarist from Poland. I think it's now time to explain fully what I'm trying to do.if you're sitting comfortably.
The OT has primary resistances of 16 ohms & 18 ohms from the CT to its ends, has a primary inductance of 4.8H 120Hz and its size is exactly like the Dagnall C2668, found in any Marshall 100W amp from 1970 onwards. 022 and a 220K to ground, the 3.3M is bypassed w/ a 10p Silver Mica - similar to any BF Fender schem
1/630V WIMA MKS4īetween V6a and V6b is a 3.3M after the. V5a & V5b = PI w/ all the values like in a Marshall 1959/2203Įxcept: Coupling caps to the output tubes =. Switchable an additional paralleled 4.7K w/ a 1.5µ/25V Tantalum bypassed But I can give you some 'corner values' from a partial analyzed 101B, if that is of some help: Andy_prs wrote:Also, unfortunately the schematic is the same as I already have, the OD channel.there must be lots more to the amp than that, right?Īlthough I've already had some Bogners on my bench, they never - to be honest - were interesting enough for me, to analyze the complete schem/layout.
0 kommentar(er)
